Cyborg

by Laura Forlano, Danya Glabau

Synopsis:

Forlano and Glabau offer critical cyborg literacy as a way of thinking through questions about the relationship between humanity and technology in areas such as engineering and computing, art and design, and health care and medicine, as well as the social sciences and humanities. Cyborg examines whether modern technologies make us all cyborgs — if we consider, for instance, the fact that we use daily technologies at work, have technologies embedded into our bodies in health care applications, or use technology to critically explore possibilities as artists, designers, activists, and creators. Lastly, Cyborg offers perspectives from critical race, feminist, and disability thinkers to help chart a path forward for cyborg theory in the twenty-first century.

This introduction to cyborg theory provides a critical vantage point for analyzing the claims around emerging technologies like automation, robots, and AI. Cyborg analyzes and reframes popular and scholarly conversations about cyborgs from the perspective of feminist cyborg theory. Drawing on their combined decades of training, teaching, and research in the social sciences, design, and engineering education, Laura Forlano and Danya Glabau introduce an approach called critical cyborg literacy. Critical cyborg literacy foregrounds power dynamics and pays attention to the ways that social and cultural factors such as gender, race, and disability shape how technology is imagined, developed, used, and resisted.

A concise introduction to cyborg theory that examines the way in which technology is situated, political, and embodied.

Danya Glabau and Laura Forlano’s Cyborg is not really about the sci-fi concept of being a cyborg. It’s a bit more down-to-earth and in the present, looking at the roles of low-paid workers and the risk of being replaced by (or at least forced to work with machines), and also the situation that people with disabilities are in with using prosthetics, reliant on technology that could suddenly stop working, etc. It’s an accessible introduction to “cyborg theory”, though it feels like reading very academic literary theory in some of the language choices, which makes it a tad less accessible. (Although I have my MA, I am not a great fan of reading literary theory.)

It does briefly touch on cyborgs in fiction, mentioning Seven of Nine but nothing more up to date, and basically dismissing Seven of Nine as not being really useful to discuss cyborg theory. I think it might behoove them to go a bit further than Star Trek: Voyager, which finished over a decade ago at this point. Characters like Ann Leckie’s Breq and Martha Wells’ Murderbot are relevant, I think, and have a lot to engage with even if you agree that Seven of Nine isn’t a worthwhile locus for discussion about the concept of cyborgs. There’s a lot of very recent fiction with very thoughtful things to say about the line between humans and machines, and when you know that, it feels a bit disingenuous to go no further than Seven of Nine.

That said, also entirely possible that they don’t really know anything about modern SF writing, and seriously think that Seven of Nine is where it’s at. A lot of people don’t consider SF “serious enough”. So I’m not saying it’s necessarily deliberate as an omission (nor that they should definitely have looked at Murderbot and Breq in particular). It’s just telling when someone uses such an out of date reference point and acts like that says something important.

That all sounds pretty critical, but I did find this interesting, slim though it is.

Rating: 3/5