Beginning of a new week, and as usual, I’ll mark it with a Fantasy with Friends post! All the prompts are hosted at Pages Unbound, if you’d like to join in. This week’s prompt is on witches in fantasy:
What are some interesting witches in fantasy? Is there a certain portrayal of a character that makes them a “witch” vs. a “sorceress” or other magic worker, in your opinion?
As ever, as soon as I’m asked a question like this, my brain goes completely blank. So let’s have a think: there are various ways witches get into fantasy stories, and different shapes they come in, which maybe will help me think of some examples! There are magical worlds where witches are a part of a wider magical landscape and everybody knows about them; one example that I’ve got started with but not finished is Samantha Birch’s Cat Dragon, for instance. There’s witches-as-known-entities, which Thorn is at the start of An Ancient Witch’s Guide to Modern Dating, and witches who are mostly secret among “normal people”, which she essentially becomes when she enters the modern world. And there are good and evil witches in fairytales.
I think “sorceress” is somewhat more often used when female characters have more power and agency than your standard witch — it has a bit more authority and a ring of scariness in a lot of worlds, and for me that’s probably the dividing line in a lot of cases. Witches might also be called sorceresses in a more formal context: I think there’s more “court sorceresses” than “court witches”, and more “hedge witches” than “village sorceresses”, in general. I suppose I might also associate it with something more formal: anyone can be a witch, but a sorceress has done a degree (so to speak).
Overall I don’t think there’s a super solid consensus on the difference between “witch” and “sorceress” and some of the other magic-workers: sometimes a witch is just what you call a female wizard, sometimes it’s a derogatory term, sometimes it mostly just means a weird older lady who knows her herbs.
I think a favourite exploration of women’s magic and what makes a witch or wizard would be Ursula Le Guin’s Earthsea books. I didn’t love it as a teen, but it all grew on me as I revisited, and realised what she was doing in The Tombs of Atuan and especially in Tehanu: re-examining the assumptions she’d made herself in writing A Wizard of Earthsea and making it (much as I think it is beautiful and important) way too much of a sausage fest. She wrote some fairly typical fantasy in that book, not at all unusual for its day in terms of the way she portrayed men and women… and then she came back to it and insisted on not sweeping it under the rug but interrogating it.
Pretty sure there’s a big space somewhere in here where I should discuss Discworld’s witches, as well, but sadly I never quite got on with the books in the series I tried to read, and haven’t yet had chance to go back to it after finding I did enjoy Going Postal… so I’ll have to leave it here.


Pratchett’s witches vs wizards is more about the “who gets to get an advanced degree”, though he never interrogated it quite as much as LeGuin. There’s been a female wizard, and some male witches (or implied witches, beekeepers and blacksmiths demonstrating magical skills get classed as witches), and you get the feeling that eventually wizards and witches would get the same gender smashing as the dwarves (supposedly all male), but it didn’t happen overtly, alas.
HarpGriffin recently posted…A book involving a piggyback ride or someone being carried
Pratchett was usually good for this sort of thing!
Yes, other magic workers! I didn’t even want to get into what makes someone a “mage” for instance, though thast seems kind of like a sorceress except the author thought it sounded cooler . . .
I’ve only read A Wizard of Earthsea, but this is reminding me I want to read some of the other books in the series.
Briana | Pages Unbound recently posted…Discussing Witches and Sorceresses in Fantasy (Fantasy with Friends)
I think a lot of the terminology is just what the author thought sounded coolest, honestly, ahaha.
I loved that Ursula Le Guin didn’t rest on her laurels, but turned around and examined her own work using new stories or essays. It’s fascinating to watch her thinking develop on it, though I didn’t like Tehanu much when I was a teen!