Review – Soundless

Posted 13 February, 2016 by Nikki in Reviews / 6 Comments

Cover of Soundless by Richelle MeadSoundless, Richelle Mead

I had pretty low expectations of Soundless, based on other people’s reactions, which perhaps helped me enjoy it a little more. I certainly don’t dispute that for something “steeped” in Chinese culture, it’s rather thin on it, and that the magical cure for deafness — coming right at the start of the book, as if all the rest of the plot couldn’t have been carried by a deaf protagonist — is kind of icky. On the other hand, at least the love interest remains deaf, and despite the star-crossed lovers thing it tries to pull, at least it’s never about the fact that Fei can hear and Li Wei can’t. It’s also nice that this is a standalone, with a self-contained plot.

It’s my first Richelle Mead book, so I can’t comment on the style and skill level as compared to her other work. It’s rather simplistically written, and for a book which involves the miraculous return of a character’s sense of hearing, it’s a little thin on the sensory descriptions apart from at key moments — there are some moving descriptions of spontaneous displays of grief, and an interesting section where Fei is beginning to realise she can hear and working out what exactly each noise means… but I feel like I should have been able to smell the paint, taste the tea, feel the grain of wood when she touches Li Wei’s carvings. That richness definitely isn’t there, and it would have added a lot, I think.

Also, on a purely technical note, I know magic is involved, but Fei has actually missed the critical period for learning to hear by a long, long way. You need the experience of hearing as a baby to really be able to understand and interpret it as an adult. At the very least, it’s much more painstaking, and I didn’t see that here either.

The set-up is also pretty simplistic: it’s only a stone’s throw from Panem, really, but less complex. There are only three classes of worker, plus beggars: miners, servants and artists. In a larger social situation, the artists’ importance would probably make more sense, but we’re given to understand it’s a pretty darn small community. Word of mouth (so to speak) works just as well in that setting, and wouldn’t be a drain on resources or manpower. Also, the division of labour versus the division of food makes very little sense.

Still, if you read Soundless as a kind of folk tale, a fable, it kind of works. I didn’t dislike reading it — and I did read it practically all in one go.

Rating: 2/5

Tags: , ,

Divider

6 Responses to “Review – Soundless”

  1. I admit I went into this with high expectations – it was my first book by Mead and after all the great stuff I’ve heard I expected more. So it’s not surprising that I was let down. But interesting how you had LOW expectations and still wasn’t all that blown away by it. It just wasn’t that well put together, I guess.

    • I alllllmost gave it three stars, but it just… didn’t inspire enthusiasm, especially after it was sold as having a deaf protagonist! Chinese culture! Such diversity! And on almost all of that it was kind of disappointing.

  2. Haha I am NEVER reading this book. I just finished getting through the copy edits on the final part of her Bloodlines series (I translated 3 out of 6 parts of that) and I’m NEVER touching another Mead book again.
    I saw pretty severe reviews about this one, too, and it seems like she’s continuing her tradition of taking a serious topic (like deafness – or depression, alcoholism, anorexia) and treating it in underinformed, simplistic ways. But yeah, I get what you’re saying: her books read really fast, despite everything. I like how you mention your low expectations! 🙂
    Man do I sound bitter… But having read some of her books more than once (and having to read the entire Vampire Academy series AND Bloodlines, too, obviously) just made me sure that she isn’t the author for me. I know she has a really devoted following but I just can’t see the appeal…

    • Eek! That confirms me in my opinion to avoid in future, I think! I’d trust your definite opinion on this, I think; I can’t imagine having to read a book I disliked over and over for translation. Erk.

  3. I haven’t seen any positive reviews on this book from any of the bloggers I follow…it’s a bummer, because this had so much potential to be amazing. I bought this one as soon as it came out, but after reading all the horrible reviews, I still haven’t gotten around to it.
    Kelly recently posted…Review: Dangerous Lies by Becca FitzpatrickMy Profile

    • Are you a fan of the author in general? Maybe that helps in appreciating it… I didn’t think it was utterly terrible, it just really didn’t sparkle for me. It was an interesting idea, at least!

Leave a Reply

CommentLuv badge

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.