Murder as a Fine Art

by Carol Carnac, E.C.R. Lorac

Genres: Crime, Mystery
Pages: 236
Series: British Library Crime Classics
Rating:

Synopsis:

When a civil servant at the newly formed Ministry of Fine Arts is found crushed beneath a monstrous marble bust after dark, it appears to be the third instance in a string of fatal accidents at the department. Already disturbed by rumours of forgeries and irregularities in the Ministry’s dealings, Minister Humphry David is soon faced with the possibility that among his colleagues is a murderer – though how the bust could have been made an instrument of death is a masterstroke of criminal devilment. Taking charge of the case, Inspector Julian Rivers of Scotland Yard enters a caustic world of fine art and civil service grievances to unveil a killer hiding in plain sight.

Murder as a Fine Art is one of E.C.R. Lorac’s books under the “Carol Carnac” pen-name, and features Rivers and Lancing rather than Macdonald. I do prefer the books which feature Macdonald, because he seems a bit more human and sympathetic than Rivers or Lancing: my sense is that the puzzle of it is more important than the human element in the books featuring them.

Which is not to say that Lorac’s usual attention to character and place is absent: the story is set within a building called Medici House, in a post-war government Ministry, and the Minister himself is a sympathetic character, one you find yourself hoping isn’t entangled in the crime. There’s definitely still a good eye to what people are like: for example, the two detectives agree that the deceased was probably not hated by his subordinates, as there’s a sort of affectionate nickname for him suggesting toleration of his foibles. And Medici House is very carefully evoked, its splendours and inconveniences all at once.

But overall there’s a lot of time spent on the howdunit, on procedure, and my impression is that there’d be a bit less of that with Macdonald — or perhaps it’d feel more hands on? Personal? I’m not sure exactly; maybe it’s just that I don’t feel I “know” Rivers and Lancing and what they’ll do or care about.

Anyway, it’s still an enjoyable puzzle. Not a favourite, but absorbing and worthwhile.

Rating: 4/5