The Heirs of Locksley
by Carrie Vaughn
Genres: Historical FictionPages: 128
Series: Robin Hood Stories #2
Rating:
Synopsis:We will hold an archery contest. A simple affair, all in fun, on the tournament grounds. Tomorrow. We will see you there.
The latest civil war in England has come and gone, King John is dead, and the nobility of England gathers to see the coronation of his son, thirteen year old King Henry III.
The new king is at the center of political rivalries and power struggles, but John of Locksley--son of the legendary Robin Hood and Lady Marian--only sees a lonely boy in need of friends. John and his sisters succeed in befriending Henry, while also inadvertently uncovering a political plot, saving a man's life, and carrying out daring escapes.
All in a day's work for the Locksley children...
I received a copy of this book for free in exchange for an honest review. This does not affect my opinion of the book or the content of my review.
The Heirs of Locksley is a follow-up to The Ghosts of Sherwood, and focuses even more on the children of Robin and Marian. What would they be like? Would they live up to their parents, and try to shape their world? They’re a little more grown-up now than in the previous book, and beginning to step out of the parents’ shadow — and there’s a new king on the throne, which has the potential to complicate everything.
I really liked Vaughn’s take on it, once I settled into what she’s trying to do with these two novellas. The children have to grapple with the legacy of their parents’ legend, and of course that leads them into trouble. In some ways it was all a bit obvious/contrived (of course they would happen to run into that one person, of all the possible people, for example), but it was satisfying nonetheless.
I also enjoyed Vaughn’s author’s note, which is satisfyingly clear about what exactly the Robin Hood legend is and what “historical correctness” is worth, or adherence to how the story “should” be. The truth (as Vaughn knows) is that there’s never been a single unifying Robin Hood story, much as Disney makes people think otherwise. It was always a handful of stories, tattered round the edges and not always fitting together. That’s part of the joy of it, and Vaughn adds a worthy little square to the tapestry.
Rating: 4/5
I only recently understood that Robin Hood wasn’t as fictional as Mr. Scrooge or Mr. Darcy. I read my Grandpa’s copy of The Merry Adventures of Robin Hood and assumed that Robin Hood was entirely the invention of Howard Pyle.
This story sounds like a fun bit of play with the legend.
It’s all a bit complicated, really! Any evidence that there was a “real” Robin Hood is very mixed — probably there were many outlaws and local stories about them that slowly amalgamated.